Delaware Sex Crime Lawyer
Aggressive Defense Against Sex Crime Charges in Delaware
Sexual offenses in Delaware carry severe penalties, including prison time, steep fines, and possible registration as a sex offender. Sex crime accusations also have a heavy stigma. In many cases, the public sees you as guilty even before you are charged or convicted.
It is crucial to defend your reputation, your future, and your rights with the help of a proven sex crime lawyer at our law firm in Delaware. We work to aggressively investigate the accusations, scrutinize witness testimony, and do whatever is necessary to undermine the prosecutor's case against you.
Our criminal defense lawyer can defend clients facing a wide range of sex offenses in Delaware, including those involving:
- Sexual assault/battery
- Rape
- Date rape
- Statutory rape
- Indecent exposure
- Computer sex crime
- Sexual conduct with a minor
- Prostitution
- Juvenile sexual offenses
Sex Offender Registration in Delaware
In Delaware, individuals convicted of a sex offense must register as sex offenders. The length of time you will be required to stay on the database depends on the severity of the crime. Once on the registry, your personal information will be made available to the public, including your crime, address, place of employment, and more. Once you are on this registry, it can be challenging to remove your name from it.
Why Trust Our Delaware Defense Team?
- Our team understands how damaging registering as a sex offender can be on a client.
- We fight to keep you off the registry or to have your requirement ended early when possible.
- Your future is important to us and we explore all our available options to minimize the effects of your charges on your future.
Contact Our Delaware Sex Crime Attorney Today
We are available 24/7 to help you. If you have been arrested for a sex-related offense, contact our Delaware sex crime lawyer today and have our experienced criminal defense attorney review your charges. Abram and Hutchison represents clients all across Sussex and Kent counties, and we welcome clients from outside of the state.
Schedule your consultation at (302) 273-1442 to get started on your defense.
```
We Care About Results
Fighting for Your Best Interest-
Dismissed Dealing Marijuana, and DUI
Originally charged with drug Dealing Marijuana, and DUI. Was able to get the drug dealing charges reduced at preliminary hearing, then trial followed. At trial was able to keep out the radar evidence in this case and the state was not able to prove Reasonable Articulable Suspicion for the stop, all charges dismissed.
-
Not Guilty DUI
A suppression motion granted for no probable cause, kept out the portable breathe test on foundation.
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI attempting to convict Mr. Abram's client for drug use - successfully argued that the state forensic chemist was not qualified to testify to the effects of the substance and the state failed to comply with expert discovery.
-
Dismissed DUI
Held a suppression hearing after the client was pulled over for not having his headlights on. Mr. Abram successfully argued that the state did not have probable cause to make an arrest.
-
Dismissed DUI
Officer stopped the Defendant for Speeding, was able to show that the Defendant performed well on his field tests and that the officer did not properly administer all of the field tests, no probable cause for arrest, case dismissed.
-
Dismissed DUI
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI arrest. Was able to successfully argue that after the performance of field tests the officer lacked probable cause to make the arrest for DUI, case dismissed.
-
Not Guilty DUI
DUI arrest. Driver was stopped for running a stop sign, it was successfully argued that the state could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, not guilty DUI.
-
Dismissed DUI
Originally convicted of DUI in Justice of the Peace Court, case was appealed to Court of Common pleas and the court found no probable cause for the arrest for DUI, case dismissed.
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI case. Case was voluntarily dismissed by the State following a motion filed by the defense challenging the validity of the stop in this case, the Defendant was not required to appear for trial.