Bethany Beach Criminal Defense Lawyers
Call 24/7 for Trusted Legal Advice & Representation
At Abram and Hutchison, we know that providing trustworthy and dependable criminal defense representation and legal advocacy is not a 9-to-5 job. Our Bethany Beach criminal defense attorneys are dedicated to their duty to protect their clients, no matter what the clock or calendar says.
If you need help with any of the following criminal defense cases, be sure to contact our firm as soon as you can:
We offer complimentary case evaluations to all of our clients so you can start learning about your case and your legal options without having to reach into your pocketbook. It is just another way our Bethany Beach criminal defense attorney puts the needs of his clients before his own.
Want to know more about our firm? Check out our testimonials and results listings.
DUI Attorney in Bethany Beach, Delaware
One of the most common forms of criminal arrests in Delaware, especially near beachfront locations like Bethany Beach, is driving under the influence (DUI). Everyone is capable of making a mistake and getting behind the wheel with their friends, just how every police officer is capable of incorrectly assessing a field sobriety test to lead to a false arrest. No matter the reason why you were pulled over and arrested for suspicion of DUI, your next step needs to be retaining reliable legal counsel as soon as you can – sometimes you only have 15 days to take action and defend yourself.
Consequences of a DUI conviction include:
- Fines paid to the state
- Driver’s license suspension or revocation
- DUI educational courses
- Up to 6 months in jail
Don’t Go Through This Alone — We’re Here to Help
When it comes to reliable criminal defense in Bethany Beach, we are proud to say that we are the number one choice for so many of our past clients. With years of experience and an intentional 100% focus on litigation resolution, our firm should be your first choice in legal representation as well.
We invite you to contact us without delay so we can start going over your case. There is no disadvantage to starting sooner than later.
We Care About Results
Fighting for Your Best Interest-
Dismissed Dealing Marijuana, and DUI
Originally charged with drug Dealing Marijuana, and DUI. Was able to get the drug dealing charges reduced at preliminary hearing, then trial followed. At trial was able to keep out the radar evidence in this case and the state was not able to prove Reasonable Articulable Suspicion for the stop, all charges dismissed.
-
Not Guilty DUI
A suppression motion granted for no probable cause, kept out the portable breathe test on foundation.
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI attempting to convict Mr. Abram's client for drug use - successfully argued that the state forensic chemist was not qualified to testify to the effects of the substance and the state failed to comply with expert discovery.
-
Dismissed DUI
Held a suppression hearing after the client was pulled over for not having his headlights on. Mr. Abram successfully argued that the state did not have probable cause to make an arrest.
-
Dismissed DUI
Officer stopped the Defendant for Speeding, was able to show that the Defendant performed well on his field tests and that the officer did not properly administer all of the field tests, no probable cause for arrest, case dismissed.
-
Dismissed DUI
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI arrest. Was able to successfully argue that after the performance of field tests the officer lacked probable cause to make the arrest for DUI, case dismissed.
-
Not Guilty DUI
DUI arrest. Driver was stopped for running a stop sign, it was successfully argued that the state could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, not guilty DUI.
-
Dismissed DUI
Originally convicted of DUI in Justice of the Peace Court, case was appealed to Court of Common pleas and the court found no probable cause for the arrest for DUI, case dismissed.
-
Dismissed DUI
DUI case. Case was voluntarily dismissed by the State following a motion filed by the defense challenging the validity of the stop in this case, the Defendant was not required to appear for trial.